<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will You Scratch My Nuts?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.who-sucks.com/video/will-you-scratch-my-nuts/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.who-sucks.com/video/will-you-scratch-my-nuts</link>
	<description>(We'll Tell You)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 08:22:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jordan shoes</title>
		<link>http://www.who-sucks.com/video/will-you-scratch-my-nuts/comment-page-1#comment-73344</link>
		<dc:creator>jordan shoes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 01:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.who-sucks.com/video/will-you-scratch-my-nuts#comment-73344</guid>
		<description>No man or woman is worth your tears, and the one who is, won&#039;t make you cry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No man or woman is worth your tears, and the one who is, won&#8217;t make you cry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bathrooms</title>
		<link>http://www.who-sucks.com/video/will-you-scratch-my-nuts/comment-page-1#comment-61704</link>
		<dc:creator>bathrooms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.who-sucks.com/video/will-you-scratch-my-nuts#comment-61704</guid>
		<description>This is such an interesting thoughtful post. Do you have anymore like this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is such an interesting thoughtful post. Do you have anymore like this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: free</title>
		<link>http://www.who-sucks.com/video/will-you-scratch-my-nuts/comment-page-1#comment-38456</link>
		<dc:creator>free</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 05:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.who-sucks.com/video/will-you-scratch-my-nuts#comment-38456</guid>
		<description>This numbnuts can appeal his case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This numbnuts can appeal his case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justice</title>
		<link>http://www.who-sucks.com/video/will-you-scratch-my-nuts/comment-page-1#comment-21065</link>
		<dc:creator>justice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 13:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.who-sucks.com/video/will-you-scratch-my-nuts#comment-21065</guid>
		<description>lol thats awful</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol thats awful</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: omar</title>
		<link>http://www.who-sucks.com/video/will-you-scratch-my-nuts/comment-page-1#comment-19053</link>
		<dc:creator>omar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 14:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.who-sucks.com/video/will-you-scratch-my-nuts#comment-19053</guid>
		<description>Those officers suck! That&#039;s torture!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those officers suck! That&#8217;s torture!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wlchamp</title>
		<link>http://www.who-sucks.com/video/will-you-scratch-my-nuts/comment-page-1#comment-7733</link>
		<dc:creator>wlchamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 19:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.who-sucks.com/video/will-you-scratch-my-nuts#comment-7733</guid>
		<description>To answer luno:

an officer also would not read a suspect his rights until he is completely sure of all charges. the charges that were read did not include the confiscation of a conceiled weapon therefore the suspect had already been searched. however i do agree with you about them uncuffing an intoxicated suspect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To answer luno:</p>
<p>an officer also would not read a suspect his rights until he is completely sure of all charges. the charges that were read did not include the confiscation of a conceiled weapon therefore the suspect had already been searched. however i do agree with you about them uncuffing an intoxicated suspect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wlchamp</title>
		<link>http://www.who-sucks.com/video/will-you-scratch-my-nuts/comment-page-1#comment-7728</link>
		<dc:creator>wlchamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 19:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.who-sucks.com/video/will-you-scratch-my-nuts#comment-7728</guid>
		<description>i saw this on Spike TV&#039;s Americas most amazing videos or something like that and i thought i was gunna pass out from laughing. i&#039;d have to agree with the suspect...when they itch they itch. you gotta hand it to him for asking. the officers reactions were priceless. would u keep a straight face???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i saw this on Spike TV&#8217;s Americas most amazing videos or something like that and i thought i was gunna pass out from laughing. i&#8217;d have to agree with the suspect&#8230;when they itch they itch. you gotta hand it to him for asking. the officers reactions were priceless. would u keep a straight face???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.who-sucks.com/video/will-you-scratch-my-nuts/comment-page-1#comment-7433</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.who-sucks.com/video/will-you-scratch-my-nuts#comment-7433</guid>
		<description>People will copy this guy, cause there&#039;s proof the officer didn&#039;t read the statement/question in full.  This numbnuts can appeal his case, thus wasting tax payers dollars.  Wouldn&#039;t it be cheaper to make a law stating that arresting officers must scratch the itches of people in custody?  SCRATCH MY NUTS!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People will copy this guy, cause there&#8217;s proof the officer didn&#8217;t read the statement/question in full.  This numbnuts can appeal his case, thus wasting tax payers dollars.  Wouldn&#8217;t it be cheaper to make a law stating that arresting officers must scratch the itches of people in custody?  SCRATCH MY NUTS!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
